Paper detail

On the accuracy of the optical determination of the proton charge radius

Determination of the proton charge radius by different methods has produced an inconsistency. The most precise value (from spectroscopy of muonic hydrogen) strongly disagrees with three less accurate values (from spectroscopy of ordinary hydrogen and deuterium, from relative measurements of the cross section of the elastic electron-proton scattering at MAMI and from evaluation of the world data on absolute measurements of e-p cross sections). Here, we question the accuracy of the determination of the proton charge radius by means of spectroscopy of ordinary hydrogen and deuterium and demonstrate that its accuracy was probably overestimated. In particular, we revisit determination from each relevant transition and find that the results of two optical experiments, which are the most statistically important, are not perfectly consistent. The inconsistency is rather a `tension' between the results than their discrepancy, however, it implies that a more conservative estimation of the uncertainty is needed. With the more realistic estimation of the uncertainty, the results for the proton charge radius from spectroscopy of ordinary and muonic atoms are rather in fair agreement.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.