Paper detail

On the accuracy of HI observations in molecular clouds -- More cold HI than thought?

We present a study of the cold atomic hydrogen (HI) content of molecular clouds simulated within the SILCC-Zoom project. We produce synthetic observations of HI at 21 cm including HI self-absorption (HISA) and observational effects. We find that HI column densities, $N_\textrm{HI}$, of $\gtrsim$10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ are frequently reached in molecular clouds with HI temperatures as low as $\sim$10 K. Hence, HISA observations assuming a fixed HI temperature tend to underestimate the amount of cold HI in molecular clouds by a factor of 3 - 10 and produce an artificial upper limit of $N_\textrm{HI}$ around 10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$. We thus argue that the cold HI mass in clouds could be a factor of a few higher than previously estimated. Also $N_\textrm{HI}$-PDFs obtained from HISA observations might be subject to observational biases and should be considered with caution. The underestimation of cold HI in HISA observations is due to both the large HI temperature variations and the effect of noise in regions of high optical depth. We find optical depths of cold HI around 1 - 10 making optical depth corrections essential. We show that the high HI column densities ($\gtrsim$10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$) can in parts be attributed to the occurrence of up to 10 individual HI-H$_2$ transitions along the line of sight. This is also reflected in the spectra, necessitating Gaussian decomposition algorithms for their analysis. However, also for a single HI-H$_2$ transition, $N_\textrm{HI}$ frequently exceeds 10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$, challenging 1D, semi-analytical models. This is due to non-equilibrium chemistry effects and the fact that HI-H$_2$ transition regions usually do not possess a 1-dimensional geometry. Finally, we show that the HI gas is moderately supersonic with Mach numbers of a few. The corresponding non-thermal velocity dispersion can be determined via HISA observations within a factor of $\sim$2.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.