Paper detail

On the accretion history of galaxy clusters: temporal and spatial distribution

We analyse the results of an Eulerian AMR cosmological simulation in order to quantify the mass growth of galaxy clusters, exploring the differences between dark matter and baryons. We have determined the mass assembly histories (MAHs) of each of the mass components and computed several proxies for the instantaneous mass accretion rate (MAR). The mass growth of both components is clearly dominated by the contribution of major mergers, but high MARs can also occur during smooth accretion periods. We explored the correlations between MARs, merger events and clusters' environments, finding the mean densities in $1 \leq r/R_{200m} \leq 1.5$ to correlate strongly with $Γ_{200m}$ in massive clusters which undergo major mergers through their MAH. From the study of the dark matter velocity profiles, we find a strong anticorrelation between the MAR proxies $Γ_{200m}$ and $α_{200m}$. Last, we present a novel approach to study the angularly-resolved distribution of gas accretion flows in simulations, which allows to extract and interpret the main contributions to the accretion picture and to assess systematic differences between the thermodynamical properties of each of these contributions using multipolar analysis. We have preliminarily applied the method to the best numerically-resolved cluster in our simulation. Amongst the most remarkable results, we find that the gas infalling through the cosmic filaments has systematically lower entropy compared to the isotropic component, but we do not find a clear distinction in temperature.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.