Paper detail

On the Absence of Broad Forbidden Emission Lines in the Low Luminosity Seyfert 1 Nucleus of NGC 3227

The absence of broad [O III] ${λλ}$4959,5007 forbidden emission lines is one of the key arguments cited in the published literature for the gas density exceeding the critical density; 7 ${\times}$ 10$^5$ cm$^{-3}$, in the broad line region (BLR) of active galactic nuclei. However, for NGC 3227, an equally valid alternative explanation is that O$^{2+}$ is progressively ionized to O$^{3+}$ as the central UV-X-ray source is approached. Observational evidence for such an ionization gradient is provided by spectra obtained with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph. Modeling the rich UV-visible spectrum of NGC 3227 with the photoionization code Cloudy supports the interpretation that the absence of broad [O III] forbidden emission lines is due to ionization, rather than high gas density, and further suggests that what we perceive as the BLR in NGC 3227 is just the illuminated portion of a much larger inflow. The low metallicity deduced for the inflowing gas suggests an origin in the circumgalactic medium.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.