Paper detail

On the absence of a universal surface density, and a maximum Newtonian acceleration in dark matter haloes: consequences for MOND

We study the dark matter (DM) surface density using the SPARC sample and {compare} it to Donato et al. (2009) result. By means of MCMC method, we infer the best-fitting parameters for each galaxy. We reobtain the scaling relation between the surface density and luminosity, and several other scaling laws relating the dark matter halo properties to that of the galactic disc properties. We conclude, in contrast with Donato et al. \cite{Donato}, that the dark matter surface density is not a universal (constant) quantity but correlates with the luminosity as well as with other galactic disc properties. A derived posterior probability distribution of $ρ_0 r_0$ shows that the null hypothesis of constancy is rejected at a very high confidence level. These results leave little room for the claimed universality of dark matter surface density. Since MOND has strong prediction on the surface density \cite{Milgrom2009}, we compared our result with those predictions, finding that MOND predictions are violated by data. To strengthen the previous result, we compared our results to another prediction of MOND (Milgrom 2005), the existence of a maximum Newtonian dark matter acceleration in the halo. Also in this case, MOND predictions are in contradiction with data. The dark matter Newtonian acceleration correlates with all the previously presented galactic disc properties, and data are distributed outside the bound predicted by Milgrom $\&$ Sanders (Milgrom 2005). We also find that the null hypothesis (constancy of DM Newtonian acceleration) is rejected at a very high confidence level.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.