Paper detail

On the 'snow-plow' phase of supernovae interacting with dense circumstellar media

Recently, Moriya et al. (2013) developed an analytic bolometric light curve model for supernovae interacting with dense circumstellar media. Because of the dense circumstellar medium, the shocked region is assumed to be radiative and make a thin dense shell. The model is based on the conservation of momentum in the shocked dense shell. However, the analytic model was mentioned to neglect the 'snow-plow' phase of the shocked dense shell by Ofek et al. (2014). The 'snow-plow' or momentum-conserving phase refers to the period in which the momentum injection from the supernova ejecta is almost terminated and the radiative shocked dense shell keeps moving due only to the momentum previously provided by the supernova ejecta. In this Note, I clarify that the analytic model of Moriya et al. (2013) does take the 'snow-plow' phase into account and the criticism of Ofek et al. (2014) is incorrect. In addition, Ofek et al. (2014) related the sudden luminosity break observed in the light curve of Type IIn SN 2010jl to the transition to the 'snow-plow' phase. However, I argue that the sudden transition to the 'snow-plow' phase is not consistent with the luminosity break observed in SN 2010jl. The luminosity break is likely to be related to other phenomena like the dense shell exiting the dense part of the circumstellar medium.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.