Paper detail

On the 3-torsion Part of the Homology of the Chessboard Complex

Let $1 \le m \le n$. We prove various results about the chessboard complex $M_{m,n}$, which is the simplicial complex of matchings in the complete bipartite graph $K_{m,n}$. First, we demonstrate that there is nonvanishing 3-torsion in $H_d(M_{m,n};Z)$ whenever $\frac{m+n-4}{3} \le d \le m-4$ and whenever $6 \le m < n$ and $d=m-3$. Combining this result with theorems due to Friedman and Hanlon and to Shareshian and Wachs, we characterize all triples $(m,n,d)$ satisfying $H_{d}(M_{m,n};Z) \neq 0$. Second, for each $k \ge 0$, we show that there is a polynomial $f_k(a,b)$ of degree 3k such that the dimension of $H_{k+a+2b-2}(M_{k+a+3b-1,k+2a+3b-1};Z_3)$, viewed as a vector space over $Z_3$, is at most $f_k(a,b)$ for all $a \ge 0$ and $b \ge k+2$. Third, we give a computer-free proof that $H_2(M_{5,5};Z) \cong Z_3$. Several proofs are based on a new long exact sequence relating the homology of a certain subcomplex of $M_{m,n}$ to the homology of $M_{m-2,n-1}$ and $M_{m-2,n-3}$.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.