Paper detail

On terminating improvement in two-player games

A real-valued game has the finite improvement property (FIP), if starting from an arbitrary strategy profile and letting the players change strategies to increase their individual payoffs in a sequential but non-deterministic order always reaches a Nash equilibrium. E.g., potential games have the FIP. Many of them have the FIP by chance nonetheless, since modifying even a single payoff may ruin the property. This article characterises (in quadratic time) the class of the finite games where FIP not only holds but is also preserved when modifying all the occurrences of an arbitrary payoff. The characterisation relies on a pattern-matching sufficient condition for games (finite or infinite) to enjoy the FIP, and is followed by an inductive description of this class. A real-valued game is weakly acyclic if the improvement described above can reach a Nash equilibrium. This article characterises the finite such games using Markov chains and almost sure convergence to equilibrium. It also gives an inductive description of the two-player such games.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.