Paper detail

On sums of squares of $k$-nomials

In 2005, Boman et al introduced the concept of factor width for a real symmetric positive semidefinite matrix. This is the smallest positive integer $k$ for which the matrix $A$ can be written as $A=VV^T$ with each column of $V$ containing at most $k$ non-zeros. The cones of matrices of bounded factor width give a hierarchy of inner approximations to the PSD cone. In the polynomial optimization context, a Gram matrix of a polynomial having factor width $k$ corresponds to the polynomial being a sum of squares of polynomials of support at most $k$. Recently, Ahmadi and Majumdar, explored this connection for case $k=2$ and proposed to relax the reliance on sum of squares polynomials in semidefinite programming to sum of binomial squares polynomials (sobs; which they call sdsos), for which semidefinite programming can be reduced to second order programming to gain scalability at the cost of some tolerable loss of precision. With this they tap into the study of sobs that goes back to Reznick and Hurwitz. In this paper, we will prove some results on the geometry of the cones of matrices with bounded factor widths and their duals, and use them to derive new results on the limitations of certificates of nonnegativity of quadratic forms by sums of $k$-nomial squares using standard multipliers. In particular we will show that they never help for symmetric quadratics, for any quadratic if $k=2$, and any quaternary quadratic if $k=3$. Furthermore we give some evidence that those are a complete list of such cases.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.