Paper detail

On strict extensional reflexivity in compact closed categories

This article studies the categorical setting of Abramsky, Haghverdi, and Scott's untyped linear combinatory algebras, and relates this to more recent work of Abramsky and Heunen on Frobenius algebras in the infinitary setting. The key to this is extensional reflexivity (the property of an object being isomorphic to its own internal hom. $N\cong [N\rightarrow N]$). We characterise extensional reflexivity in compact closed categories, and consider how this may be `strictified' to give monoidally equivalent categories where the isomorphisms exhibiting reflexivity are identity arrows. This results in two-object compact closed categories consisting of a unit object, and a non-unit extensionally reflexive object. We study the endomorphism monoids of such `strictly extensionally reflexive' objects from an algebraic viewpoint. They necessarily contain an interesting monoid that may be thought of as Richard Thompson's iconic group F together with the equally iconic bicyclic monoid of semigroup theory, with non-trivial interactions between the two derived from the Frobenius algebra identity. We claim this as a significant example of the (unitless) Frobenius algebras of Abramsky and Heunen. We then give concrete examples, based on the algebra and category theory behind the Geometry of Interaction program. These are based on the traced monoidal category of partial injections, and reflexive objects in the compact closed category that results from applying the Int or GoI construction. We give compact closed categories, monoidally equivalent to compact closed subcategories of Int(pInj), where this reflexivity is exhibited by identity arrows, and show how the above algebraic structures (Thompson's F, the bicyclic monoid, and Frobenius algebras) arise in a fundamental manner.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.