Paper detail

On stability of difference schemes

The stability of nonlinear explicit difference schemes with not, in general, open domains of the scheme operators are studied. For the case of path-connected, bounded, and Lipschitz domains, we establish the notion that a multi-level nonlinear explicit scheme is stable iff (if and only if) the corresponding scheme in variations is stable. A new modification of the central Lax-Friedrichs (LxF) scheme is developed to be of the second order accuracy. The modified scheme is based on nonstaggered grids. A monotone piecewise cubic interpolation is used in the central scheme to give an accurate approximation for the model in question. The stability of the modified scheme is investigated. Some versions of the modified scheme are tested on several conservation laws, and the scheme is found to be accurate and robust. As applied to hyperbolic conservation laws with, in general, stiff source terms, it is constructed a second order nonstaggered central scheme based on operator-splitting techniques.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.