Paper detail

On spherically symmetric vacuum solutions and horizons in covariant $f(T)$ gravity theory

In this paper we study properties that the vacuum must possess in the minimal extension to the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) where the action is supplemented with a quadratic torsion term. No assumption is made about the weakness of the quadratic term although in the weak-field regime the validity of our previously derived perturbative solution is confirmed. Regarding the exact nature of the vacuum, it is found that if the center of symmetry is to be regular, the mathematical conditions on the tetrad at the isotropy point mimic those of general relativity. With respect to horizons it is found that, under very mild assumptions, a smooth horizon cannot exist unless the quadratic torsion coupling, $α$, vanishes, which is the TEGR limit (with the Schwarzschild tetrad as its solution). This analysis is then supplemented with computational work utilizing asymptotically Schwarzschild boundary data. It is verified that in no case studied does a smooth horizon form. For $α> 0$ naked singularities occur which break down the equations of motion before a horizon can form. For $α< 0$ there is a limited range of $α$ where a vacuum horizon might exist but, if present, the horizon is singular. Therefore physically acceptable black hole horizons are problematic in the studied theory at least within the realm of vacuum static spherical symmetry. These results also imply that static spherical matter distributions generally must have extra restrictions on their spatial extent and stress-energy bounds so as to render the vacuum solution invalid in the singular region and make the solutions finite.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.