Paper detail

On spectropolarimetric measurements with visible lines

The ability of new instruments for providing accurate inferences of vector magnetic fields and line-of-sight velocities of the solar plasma depends a great deal on the sensitivity to these physical quantities of the spectral lines chosen to be measured. Recently, doubts have been raised about visible Stokes profiles to provide a clear distinction between weak fields and strong ones filling a small fraction of the observed area. The goal of this paper is to give qualitative and quantitative arguments that help in settling the debate since several instruments that employ visible lines are either operating or planned for the near future. The sensitivity of the Stokes profiles is calculated through the response functions (e.g. Ruiz Cobo & Del Toro Iniesta, 1994). Both theoretical and empirical evidences are gathered in favor of the reliability of visible Stokes profiles. The response functions are used as well for estimating the uncertainties in the physical quantities due to noise in the observations. A useful formula has been derived that takes into account the measurement technique (number of polarization measurements, polarimetric efficiencies, number of wavelength samples), the model assumptions (number of free parameters, the filling factor), and the radiative transfer (response functions). We conclude that a scenario with a weak magnetic field can reasonably be distinguished with visible lines from another with a strong field but a similar Stokes $V$ amplitude, provided that the Milne-Eddington approximation is good enough to describe the solar atmosphere and that the polarization signal is at least three or four times larger than the typical rms noise of $ 10^{-3} I_{\rm c}$ reached in the observations.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.