Paper detail

On some polynomials enumerating Fully Packed Loops configurations, evaluation at negative values

In this article, we are interested in the enumeration of Fully Packed Loops configurations on a grid with a given noncrossing matching. These quantities also appear as the groundstate components of the Completely Packed Loops model as conjectured by Razumov and Stroganov and recently proved by Cantini and Sportiello. When considering matchings with p nested arches these quantities are known to be polynomials. In a recent article, Fonseca and Nadeau conjectured some unexpected properties of these polynomials, suggesting that these quantities could be combinatorially interpreted even for negative p. Here, we prove some of these conjectures. Notably, we prove that for negative p we can factor the polynomials into two parts a "positive" one and a "negative" one. Also, a sum rules of the negative part is proven.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.