Paper detail

On some nice polynomial automorphisms

Given a polynomial endomorphism F of the n-dimensional affine space over a field K, we define a sequence of polynomial endomorphisms of the affine space associated to F. We call F nice if there exists an integer m such that the m-th term of the sequence vanishes. Then F is invertible and its inverse may be computed in terms of the endomorphisms in the sequence. In this paper we study the class of nice polynomial automorphisms and obtain that this class is large and includes triangulable automorphisms and all linear cubic homogeneous polynomial automorphisms of nilpotence index up to 3. We prove as well that the nicety property is invariant under linear conjugation and determine that seven of the eight forms in Hubbers' classification of cubic homogeneous automorphisms in dimension 4 are nice and moreover the eighth one is a composition of nice maps.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.