Paper detail

On Smoothing, Regularization and Averaging in Stochastic Approximation Methods for Stochastic Variational Inequalities

Traditionally, stochastic approximation schemes for SVIs have relied on strong monotonicity and Lipschitzian properties of the underlying map. In contrast, we consider monotone stochastic variational inequality (SVI) problems where the strong monotonicity and Lipschitzian assumptions on the mappings are weakened. In the first part of the paper, to address such shortcomings, a regularized smoothed SA (RSSA) scheme is developed wherein the stepsize, smoothing, and regularization parameters are diminishing sequences updated after every iteration. Under suitable assumptions on the sequences, we show that the algorithm generates iterates that converge to a solution in an almost sure sense, extending the results in [16] to the non-Lipschitzian regime. Motivated by the need to develop non-asymptotic rate statements, in the second part of the paper, we develop a variant of the RSSA scheme, denoted by aRSSA$_r$, in which we employ a weighted iterate-averaging, parametrized by a scalar $r$ where $r = 1$ provides us with the standard averaging scheme. We make several contributions in this context: First, we show that the gap function associated with the sequences by the aRSSA$_r$ scheme tends to zero when the parameter sequences are chosen appropriately. Second, we show that the gap function associated with the averaged sequence diminishes to zero at the optimal rate $\cal{O}(1/\sqrt{K})$ after $K$ steps when smoothing and regularization are suppressed and $r < 1$, thus improving the rate statement for the standard averaging which admits a rate of $\cal{O}(\ln(K)/\sqrt{K})$. Third, we develop a window-based variant of this scheme that also displays the optimal rate for $r < 1$. Notably, we prove the superiority of the scheme with $r < 1$ with its counterpart with $r=1$ in terms of the constant factor of the error bound when the size of the averaging window is sufficiently large.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.