Paper detail

On small bases for which $1$ has countably many expansions

Let $q\in(1,2)$. A $q$-expansion of a number $x$ in $[0,\frac{1}{q-1}]$ is a sequence $(δ_i)_{i=1}^\infty\in\{0,1\}^{\mathbb{N}}$ satisfying $$ x=\sum_{i=1}^\infty\frac{δ_i}{q^i}.$$ Let $\mathcal{B}_{\aleph_0}$ denote the set of $q$ for which there exists $x$ with a countable number of $q$-expansions, and let $\mathcal{B}_{1, \aleph_0}$ denote the set of $q$ for which $1$ has a countable number of $q$-expansions. In \cite{Sidorov6} it was shown that $\min\mathcal{B}_{\aleph_0}=\min\mathcal{B}_{1,\aleph_0}=\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2},$ and in \cite{Baker} it was shown that $\mathcal{B}_{\aleph_0}\cap(\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}, q_1]=\{ q_1\}$, where $q_1(\approx1.64541)$ is the positive root of $x^6-x^4-x^3-2x^2-x-1=0$. In this paper we show that the second smallest point of $\mathcal{B}_{1,\aleph_0}$ is $q_3(\approx1.68042)$, the positive root of $x^5-x^4-x^3-x+1=0$. Enroute to proving this result we show that $\mathcal{B}_{\aleph_0}\cap(q_1, q_3]=\{ q_2, q_3\}$, where $q_2(\approx1.65462)$ is the positive root of $x^6-2x^4-x^3-1=0$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.