Paper detail

On simple analytic models of microlensing amplification statistics

Gravitational microlensing is a key probe of the nature of dark matter and its distribution on the smallest scales. For many practical purposes, confronting theory to observation requires to model the probability that a light source is highly amplified by many-lens systems. This article reviews four simple analytic models of the amplification probability distribution, based on different approximations: (i) the strongest-lens model; (ii) the multiplicative model, where the total amplification is assumed to be the product of all the lenses' individual amplifications; (iii) a hybrid version of the previous two; and (iv) an empirical fitting function. In particular, a new derivation of the multiplicative amplification distribution is proposed, thereby correcting errors in the literature. Finally, the accuracy of these models is tested against ray-shooting simulations. They all produce excellent results as long as lenses are light and rare (low optical depth); however, for larger optical depths, none of them succeeds in capturing the relevant features of the amplification distribution. This conclusion emphasizes the crucial role of lens-lens coupling at large optical depths.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.