Paper detail

On Shallow Packings and Tusnády's Problem

Tusnády's problem asks to bound the discrepancy of points and axis-parallel boxes in $\mathbb{R}^d$. Algorithmic bounds on Tusnády's problem use a canonical decomposition of Matoušek for the system of points and axis-parallel boxes, together with other techniques like partial coloring and / or random-walk based methods. We use the notion of \emph{shallow cell complexity} and the \emph{shallow packing lemma}, together with the chaining technique, to obtain an improved decomposition of the set system. Coupled with an algorithmic technique of Bansal and Garg for discrepancy minimization, which we also slightly extend, this yields improved algorithmic bounds on Tusnády's problem. For $d\geq 5$, our bound matches the lower bound of $Ω(\log^{d-1}n)$ given by Matoušek, Nikolov and Talwar [IMRN, 2020] -- settling Tusnády's problem, upto constant factors. For $d=2,3,4$, we obtain improved algorithmic bounds of $O(\log^{7/4}n)$, $O(\log^{5/2}n)$ and $O(\log^{13/4}n)$ respectively, which match or improve upon the non-constructive bounds of Nikolov for $d\geq 3$. Further, we also give improved bounds for the discrepancy of set systems of points and polytopes in $\mathbb{R}^d$ generated via translations of a fixed set of hyperplanes. As an application, we also get a bound for the geometric discrepancy of anchored boxes in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with respect to an arbitrary measure, matching the upper bound for the Lebesgue measure, which improves on a result of Aistleitner, Bilyk, and Nikolov [MC and QMC methods, \emph{Springer, Proc. Math. Stat.}, 2018] for $d\geq 4$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.