Paper detail

On sets defining few ordinary hyperplanes

Let $P$ be a set of $n$ points in real projective $d$-space, not all contained in a hyperplane, such that any $d$ points span a hyperplane. An ordinary hyperplane of $P$ is a hyperplane containing exactly $d$ points of $P$. We show that if $d\ge 4$, the number of ordinary hyperplanes of $P$ is at least $\binom{n-1}{d-1} - O_d(n^{\lfloor(d-1)/2\rfloor})$ if $n$ is sufficiently large depending on $d$. This bound is tight, and given $d$, we can calculate the exact minimum number for sufficiently large $n$. This is a consequence of a structure theorem for sets with few ordinary hyperplanes: For any $d \ge 4$ and $K > 0$, if $n \ge C_d K^8$ for some constant $C_d > 0$ depending on $d$ and $P$ spans at most $K\binom{n-1}{d-1}$ ordinary hyperplanes, then all but at most $O_d(K)$ points of $P$ lie on a hyperplane, an elliptic normal curve, or a rational acnodal curve. We also find the maximum number of $(d+1)$-point hyperplanes, solving a $d$-dimensional analogue of the orchard problem. Our proofs rely on Green and Tao's results on ordinary lines, our earlier work on the $3$-dimensional case, as well as results from classical algebraic geometry.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.