Paper detail

On saturation of betatron acceleration of dust particles behind shock fronts

Possible saturation of betatron acceleration of dust particles behind strong shock fronts from supernovae is considered. It is argued that the efficiency of the nonthermal dust destruction should be substantially lower than the value estimated from a traditional description of betatron acceleration of dust grains behind radiative shock waves. The inhibition of the nonthermal destruction can be connected with the mirror instability developed in the dust component behind strong shocks with the velocity 3 times exceeding the Alfvén speed. The instability develops on characteristic time scales much shorter the age of a supernova remnant, thus its influence on the efficiency of dust destruction can be substantial: in the range of shock velocities 100 km s$^{-1}<v_s<300$ km s$^{-1}$ the destruction efficiency can be an order of magnitude lower that normally estimated.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.