Paper detail

On Reward-Penalty-Selection Games

The Reward-Penalty-Selection Problem (RPSP) can be seen as a combination of the Set Cover Problem (SCP) and the Hitting Set Problem (HSP). Given a set of elements, a set of reward sets, and a set of penalty sets, one tries to find a subset of elements such that as many reward sets as possible are covered, i.e. all elements are contained in the subset, and at the same time as few penalty sets as possible are hit, i.e. the intersection of the subset with the penalty set is non-empty. In this paper we define a cooperative game based on the RPSP where the elements of the RPSP are the players. We prove structural results and show that RPS games are convex, superadditive and totally balanced. Furthermore, the Shapley value can be computed in polynomial time. In addition to that, we provide a characterization of the core elements as a feasible flow in a network graph depending on the instance of the underlying RPSP. By using this characterization, a core element can be computed efficiently.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.