Paper detail

On replica symmetry of large deviations in random graphs

The following question is due to Chatterjee and Varadhan (2011). Fix $0<p<r<1$ and take $G\sim G(n,p)$, the Erdős-Rényi random graph with edge density $p$, conditioned to have at least as many triangles as the typical $G(n,r)$. Is $G$ close in cut-distance to a typical $G(n,r)$? Via a beautiful new framework for large deviation principles in $G(n,p)$, Chatterjee and Varadhan gave bounds on the replica symmetric phase, the region of $(p,r)$ where the answer is positive. They further showed that for any small enough $p$ there are at least two phase transitions as $r$ varies. We settle this question by identifying the replica symmetric phase for triangles and more generally for any fixed $d$-regular graph. By analyzing the variational problem arising from the framework of Chatterjee and Varadhan we show that the replica symmetry phase consists of all $(p,r)$ such that $(r^d,h_p(r))$ lies on the convex minorant of $x\mapsto h_p(x^{1/d})$ where $h_p$ is the rate function of a binomial with parameter $p$. In particular, the answer for triangles involves $h_p(\sqrt{x})$ rather than the natural guess of $h_p(x^{1/3})$ where symmetry was previously known. Analogous results are obtained for linear hypergraphs as well as the setting where the largest eigenvalue of $G\sim G(n,p)$ is conditioned to exceed the typical value of the largest eigenvalue of $G(n,r)$. Building on the work of Chatterjee and Diaconis (2012) we obtain additional results on a class of exponential random graphs including a new range of parameters where symmetry breaking occurs. En route we give a short alternative proof of a graph homomorphism inequality due to Kahn (2001) and Galvin and Tetali (2004).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.