Paper detail

On relativistic motion of a pair of particles having opposite signs of masses

(abbreviated) In this note we consider, in a weak-field limit, a relativistic linear motion of two particles with opposite signs of masses having a small difference between their absolute values $m_{1,2}=\pm (μ\pm Δμ) $, $μ> 0$, $|Δμ| \ll μ$ and a small difference between their velocities. Assuming that the weak-field limit holds and the dynamical system is conservative an elementary treatment of the problem based on the laws of energy and momentum conservation shows that the system can be accelerated indefinitely, or attain very large asymptotic values of the Lorentz factor $γ$. The system experiences indefinite acceleration when its energy-momentum vector is null and the mass difference $Δμ\le 0$. When modulus of the square of the norm of the energy-momentum vector, $|N^2|$, is sufficiently small the system can be accelerated to very large $γ\propto |N^2|^{-1}$. It is stressed that when only leading terms in the ratio of a characteristic gravitational radius to the distance between the particles are retained our elementary analysis leads to equations of motion equivalent to those derived from relativistic weak-field equations of motion of Havas and Goldberg 1962. Thus, in the weak-field approximation, it is possible to bring the system to the state with extremely high values of $γ$. The positive energy carried by the particle with positive mass may be conveyed to other physical bodies say, by intercepting this particle with a target. Suppose that there is a process of production of such pairs and the particles with positive mass are intercepted while the negative mass particles are expelled from the region of space occupied by physical bodies of interest. This scheme could provide a persistent transfer of positive energy to the bodies, which may be classified as a 'Perpetuum Motion of Third Kind'.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.