Paper detail

On Regret of Parametric Mismatch in Minimum Mean Square Error Estimation

This paper studies the effect of parametric mismatch in minimum mean square error (MMSE) estimation. In particular, we consider the problem of estimating the input signal from the output of an additive white Gaussian channel whose gain is fixed, but unknown. The input distribution is known, and the estimation process consists of two algorithms. First, a channel estimator blindly estimates the channel gain using past observations. Second, a mismatched MMSE estimator, optimized for the estimated channel gain, estimates the input signal. We analyze the regret, i.e., the additional mean square error, that is raised in this process. We derive upper-bounds on both absolute and relative regrets. Bounds are expressed in terms of the Fisher information. We also study regret for unbiased, efficient channel estimators, and derive a simple trade-off between Fisher information and relative regret. This trade-off shows that the product of a certain function of relative regret and Fisher information equals the signal-to-noise ratio, independent of the input distribution. The trade-off relation implies that higher Fisher information results to smaller expected relative regret.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.