Paper detail

On quasi-parallel whistler waves in the solar wind

The recent simulations showed that the whistler heat flux instability, which presumably produces the most of quasi-parallel coherent whistler waves in the solar wind, is not efficient in regulating the electron heat conduction. In addition, recent spacecraft measurements indicated that some fraction of coherent whistler waves in the solar wind may propagate anti-parallel to the electron heat flux, being produced due to a perpendicular temperature anisotropy of suprathermal electrons. We present analysis of properties of parallel and anti-parallel whistler waves unstable at electron heat fluxes and temperature anisotropies of suprathermal electrons typical of the pristine solar wind. Assuming the electron population consisting of counter-streaming dense thermal core and tenuous suprathermal halo populations, we perform a linear stability analysis to demonstrate that anti-parallel whistler waves are expected to have smaller frequencies, wave numbers and growth rates compared to parallel whistler waves. The stability analysis is performed over a wide range of parameters of core and halo electron populations. Using the quasi-linear scaling relation we show that anti-parallel whistler waves saturate at amplitudes of one order of magnitude smaller than parallel whistler waves, which is at about $10^{-3}\;B_0$ in the pristine solar wind. The analysis shows that the presence of anti-parallel whistler waves in the pristine solar wind is more likely to be obscured by turbulent magnetic field fluctuations, because of lower frequencies and smaller amplitudes compared to parallel whistler waves. The presented results will be also valuable for numerical simulations of the electron heat flux regulation in the solar wind.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.