Paper detail

On quantification of systemic redundancy in reliable systems

In this paper, we consider the problem of quantifying systemic redundancy in reliable systems having multiple controllers with overlapping functionality. In particular, we consider a multi-channel system with multi-controller configurations -- where controllers are required to respond optimally, in the sense of best-response correspondence, a {\it reliable-by-design} requirement, to non-faulty controllers so as to ensure or maintain some system properties. Here we introduce a mathematical framework, based on the notion of relative entropy of probability measures associated with steady-state solutions of Fokker-Planck equations for a family of stochastically perturbed multi-channel systems, that provides useful information towards a systemic assessment of redundancy in the system.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.