Paper detail

On $Q$-Tensors

One of the central problems in the theory of linear complementarity problems (LCPs) is to study the class of $Q$-matrices since it characterizes the solvability of LCP. Recently, the concept of $Q$-matrix has been extended to the case of tensor, called $Q$-tensor, which characterizes the solvability of the corresponding tensor complementarity problem -- a generalization of LCP; and some basic results related to $Q$-tensors have been obtained in the literature. In this paper, we extend two famous results related to $Q$-matrices to the tensor space, i.e., we show that within the class of strong $P_0$-tensors or nonnegative tensors, four classes of tensors, i.e., $R_0$-tensors, $R$-tensors, $ER$-tensors and $Q$-tensors, are all equivalent. We also construct several examples to show that three famous results related to $Q$-matrices cannot be extended to the tensor space; and one of which gives a negative answer to a question raised recently by Song and Qi.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.