Abstract

We make progress on some questions related to polynomial approximations of AC0{\rm AC}^0. It is known, by works of Tarui (Theoret. Comput. Sci. 1993) and Beigel, Reingold, and Spielman (Proc. 66th CCC, 1991), that any AC0{\rm AC}^0 circuit of size ss and depth dd has an ε\varepsilon-error probabilistic polynomial over the reals of degree (log⁡(s/ε))O(d)(\log (s/\varepsilon))^{O(d)}. We improve this upper bound to (log⁡s)O(d)⋅log⁡(1/ε)(\log s)^{O(d)}\cdot \log(1/\varepsilon), which is much better for small values of ε\varepsilon. We give an application of this result by using it to resolve a question posed by Tal (ECCC 2014): we show that (log⁡s)O(d)⋅log⁡(1/ε)(\log s)^{O(d)}\cdot \log(1/\varepsilon)-wise independence fools AC0{\rm AC}^0, improving on Tal's strengthening of Braverman's theorem (J. ACM, 2010) that (log⁡(s/ε))O(d)(\log (s/\varepsilon))^{O(d)}-wise independence fools AC0{\rm AC}^0. Up to the constant implicit in the O(d)O(d), our result is tight. As far as we know, this is the first PRG construction for AC0{\rm AC}^0 that achieves optimal dependence on the error ε\varepsilon. We also prove lower bounds on the best polynomial approximations to AC0{\rm AC}^0. We show that any polynomial approximating the OR{\rm OR} function on nn bits to a small constant error must have degree at least Ω~(log⁡n)\widetildeΩ(\sqrt{\log n}). This result improves exponentially on a recent lower bound demonstrated by Meka, Nguyen, and Vu (arXiv 2015).

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.