Paper detail

On phase asymmetries in oscillatory pipe flow

We present results from direct numerical simulations (DNS) of oscillatory pipe flow at several dimensionless frequencies Wo = {6.5, 13, 26} and one fixed shear Reynolds number Re_τ = 1440. Starting from a fully-developed turbulent velocity field at that Re_τ, the oscillatory flow either relaminarises or reaches a conditionally turbulent or strongly asymmetric state depending on Wo. The numerical method is validated by demonstrating excellent agreement of our DNS results with experimental data and analytical predictions from literature for the limiting cases of non-oscillating but turbulent and oscillating but laminar pipe flow. For an oscillating turbulent pipe flow we further found a very good agreement between qualitative descriptions of the characteristic flow features observed in experiments and our DNS. Here, we focus on the observation of a strongly asymmetric behaviour between the positive and the negative half-cycles of the oscillatory pipe flow at Wo=6.5.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.