Paper detail

On Perfect Privacy

The problem of private data disclosure is studied from an information theoretic perspective. Considering a pair of dependent random variables $(X,Y)$, where $X$ and $Y$ denote the private and useful data, respectively, the following problem is addressed: What is the maximum information that can be revealed about $Y$ (measured by mutual information $I(Y;U)$, in which $U$ is the revealed data), while disclosing no information about $X$ (captured by the condition of statistical independence, i.e., $X\independent U$, and henceforth, called \textit{perfect privacy})? We analyze the supremization of \textit{utility}, i.e., $I(Y;U)$ under the condition of perfect privacy for two scenarios: \textit{output perturbation} and \textit{full data observation} models, which correspond to the cases where a Markov kernel, called \textit{privacy-preserving mapping}, applies to $Y$ and the pair $(X,Y)$, respectively. When both $X$ and $Y$ have a finite alphabet, the linear algebraic analysis involved in the solution provides some interesting results, such as upper/lower bounds on the size of the released alphabet and the maximum utility. Afterwards, it is shown that for the jointly Gaussian $(X,Y)$, perfect privacy is not possible in the output perturbation model in contrast to the full data observation model. Finally, an asymptotic analysis is provided to obtain the rate of released information when a sufficiently small leakage is allowed. In particular, in the context of output perturbation model, it is shown that this rate is always finite when perfect privacy is not feasible, and two lower bounds are provided for it; When perfect privacy is feasible, it is shown that under mild conditions, this rate becomes unbounded.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.