Paper detail

On particles in equilibrium on the real line

We study equilibrium configurations of infinitely many identical particles on the real line or finitely many particles on the circle, such that the (repelling) force they exert on each other depends only on their distance. The main question is whether each equilibrium configuration needs to be an arithmetic progression. Under very broad assumptions on the force we show this for the particles on the circle. In the case of infinitely many particles on the line we show the same result under the assumption that the maximal (or the minimal) gap between successive points is finite (positive) and assumed at some pair of successive points. Under the assumption of analyticity for the force field (e.g., the Coulomb force) we deduce some extra rigidity for the configuration: knowing an equilibrium configuration of points in a half-line determines it throughout. Various properties of the equlibrium configuration are proved.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.