Paper detail

On numerical nonvanishing for generalized log canonical pairs

The nonvanishing conjecture for projective log canonical pairs plays a key role in the minimal model program of higher dimensional algebraic geometry. The numerical nonvanishing conjecture considered in this paper is a weaker version of the usual nonvanishing conjecture, but valid in the more general setting of generalized log canonical pairs. We confirm it in dimension two. Under some necessary conditions we obtain effective versions of numerical nonvanishing for surfaces. Several applications are also discussed. In higher dimensions, we mainly consider the conjecture for generalized klt pairs $(X, B+\mathbf{M})$, and reduce it to lower dimensions when $K_X+\mathbf{M}_X$ is not pseudo-effective. Up to scaling the nef part, we prove the numerical nonvanishing for pseudo-effective generalized lc threefolds with rational singularities.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.