Paper detail

On Nontrivial Weak Dicomplementations and the Lattice Congruences that Preserve Them

We study the existence of nontrivial and of representable (dual) weak complementations, along with the lattice congruences that preserve them, in different constructions of bounded lattices, then use this study to determine the finite (dual) weakly complemented lattices with the largest numbers of congruences, along with the structures of their congruence lattices. It turns out that, if $n\geq 7$ is a natural number, then the four largest numbers of congruences of the $n$--element (dual) weakly complemented lattices are: $2^{n-2}+1$, $2^{n-3}+1$, $5\cdot 2^{n-6}+1$ and $2^{n-4}+1$. For smaller numbers of elements, several intermediate numbers of congruences appear between the elements of this sequence. After determining these numbers, along with the structures of the (dual) weakly complemented lattices having these numbers of congruences, we derive a similar result for weakly dicomplemented lattices.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.