Paper detail

On Non-Standard Models of Peano Arithmetic and Tennenbaum's Theorem

Throughout the course of mathematical history, generalizations of previously understood concepts and structures have led to the fruitful development of the hierarchy of number systems, non-euclidean geometry, and many other epochal phases in mathematical progress. In the study of formalized theories of arithmetic, it is only natural to consider the extension from the standard model of Peano arithmetic, $\langle \mathbb{N},+,\times,\leq,0,1 \rangle$, to non-standard models of arithmetic. The existence of non-standard models of Peano arithmetic provided motivation in the early $20^{th}$ century for a variety of questions in model theory regarding the classification of models up to isomorphism and the properties that non-standard models of Peano arithmetic have. This paper presents these questions and the necessary results to prove Tennenbaum's Theorem, which draws an explicit line between the properties of standard and non-standard models; namely, that no countable non-standard model of Peano arithmetic is recursive. These model-theoretic results have contributed to the foundational framework within which research programs developed by Skolem, Rosser, Tarski, Mostowski and others have flourished. While such foundational topics were crucial to active fields of research during the middle of the $20^{th}$ century, numerous open questions about models of arithmetic, and model theory in general, still remain pertinent to the realm of $21^{st}$ century mathematical discourse.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.