Paper detail

On non-Gaussianity in the Cosmic Microwave Background

We consider a cosmological model with non-Gaussian initial perturbations, which in principle could be generated in non-standard inflationary scenarios with two or more scalar fields. In particular we focus our attention on the model proposed by Linde & Mukhanov (1997) perturbations are quadratic in a Gaussian field. These perturbations, if they exist, have to be observable as a non-Gaussian distribution of the CMB signal on the sky. In order to efficiently pick up the non-Gaussian signal in CMB maps of degree resolution, one can use Minkowski Functionals and peak statistics. Our paper contains the theoretical predictions of the properties for Minkowski Functionals and distributions of peaks of the CMB anisotropy in the model with "squared" Gaussian statistics. Likelihood comparison of the four-year COBE DMR data to this non-Gaussian model and the standard Gaussian model does not select any of them as most likely. We also suggest an efficient algorithm for fast simulation of CMB maps on the whole sky. Using a cylindrical partition of the sphere, we rewrite the spherical harmonics analysis as a Fourier transform in flat space, which makes the problem accessible to numerically advantageous FFT methods.

preprint2000arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.