Paper detail

On Newton-polytope-type sufficiency conditions for coercivity of polynomials

We identify new sufficiency conditions for coercivity of general multivariate polynomials $f\in\mathbb{R}[x]$ which are expressed in terms of their Newton polytopes at infinity and which consist of a system of affine-linear inequalities in the space of polynomial coefficients. By sharpening the already existing necessary conditions for coercivity for a class of gem irregular polynomials we provide a characterization of coercivity of circuit polynomials, which extends the known results on this well studied class of polynomials. For the already existing sufficiency conditions for coercivity which contain a description involving a set projection operation, we identify an equivalent description involving a single posynomial inequality. This makes them more easy to apply and hence also more appealing from the practical perspective. We relate our results to the existing literature and we illustrate our results with several examples.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.