Paper detail

On Near-Infrared H-Alpha Searches for High-Redshift Galaxies

The lack of success of Lyman-alpha searches for high-redshift (z>2) field galaxies may be due to extinction by dust, suggesting that surveys based on lines of longer wavelength, particularly H-alpha, may be more effective. To test the dust hypothesis we have undertaken deep broad- (K') and narrow-band (5000 km/s, 2.177 micron) imaging of the field towards the quasar PHL957, in an attempt to detect H-alpha emission from a known galaxy of redshift z=2.313. We cover an area of 4.9 square arcmin (0.28 h^{-2}Mpc^2) to a 4-sigma limiting narrow-band flux f=2.7x10^{-16}erg/s/cm^2, a factor of several deeper than previously published surveys. We detect the H-alpha+[N II] emission line in this galaxy at the 3.3-sigma level, inferring a star formation rate of 18 h^{-2} solar masses per year. This is a factor only a few times larger than the rate seen in some Sc galaxies today. The faint flux level reached in this work demonstrates the promise of narrow-band imaging in the near-infrared as a technique for finding normal galaxies at high redshifts.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.