Paper detail

On multiple and infinite log-concavity

Following Boros--Moll, a sequence $(a_n)$ is $m$-log-concave if $\mathcal{L}^j (a_n) \geq 0$ for all $j = 0, 1, \ldots, m$. Here, $\mathcal{L}$ is the operator defined by $\mathcal{L} (a_n) = a_n^2 - a_{n - 1} a_{n + 1}$. By a criterion of Craven--Csordas and McNamara--Sagan it is known that a sequence is $\infty$-log-concave if it satisfies the stronger inequality $a_k^2 \geq r a_{k - 1} a_{k + 1}$ for large enough $r$. On the other hand, a recent result of Brändén shows that $\infty$-log-concave sequences include sequences whose generating polynomial has only negative real roots. In this paper, we investigate sequences which are fixed by a power of the operator $\mathcal{L}$ and are therefore $\infty$-log-concave for a very different reason. Surprisingly, we find that sequences fixed by the non-linear operators $\mathcal{L}$ and $\mathcal{L}^2$ are, in fact, characterized by a linear 4-term recurrence. In a final conjectural part, we observe that positive sequences appear to become $\infty$-log-concave if convoluted with themselves a finite number of times.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.