Paper detail

On Motohashi's formula

We complement and offer a new perspective of the proof of a Motohashi-type formula relating the fourth moment of $L$-functions for $\mathrm{GL}_1$ with the third moment of $L$-functions for $\mathrm{GL}_2$ over number fields, studied earlier by Michel-Venkatesh and Nelson. Our main tool is a new type of pre-trace formula with test functions on $\mathrm{M}_2(\mathbb{A})$ instead of $\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbb{A})$, on whose spectral side the matrix coefficients are replaced by the standard Godement-Jacquet zeta integrals. This is also a generalization of Bruggeman-Motohashi's other proof of Motohashi's formula. We give a variation of our method in the case of division quaternion algebras instead of $\mathrm{M}_2$, yielding a new spectral reciprocity, for which we are not sure if it is within the period formalism given by Michel-Venkatesh. We also indicate a further possible generalization, which seems to be beyond what the period method can offer.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.