Paper detail

On More General Distributions of Random Binning for Slepian-Wolf Encoding

Traditionally, ensembles of Slepian-Wolf (SW) codes are defined such that every bin of each $n$-vector of each source is randomly drawn under the uniform distribution across the sets $\{0,1,\ldots,2^{nR_X}-1\}$ and $\{0,1,\ldots,2^{nR_Y}-1\}$, where $R_X$ and $R_Y$ are the coding rates of the two sources, $X$ and $Y$, respectively. In a few more recent works, where only one source, say, $X$, is compressed and the other one, $Y$, serves as side information available at the decoder, the scope is extended to variable-rate S-W (VRSW) codes, where the rate is allowed to depend on the type class of the source string, but still, the random-binning distribution is assumed uniform within the corresponding, type-dependent, bin index set. In this expository work, we investigate the role of the uniformity of the random binning distribution from the perspective of the trade-off between the reliability (defined in terms of the error exponent) and the compression performance (measured from the viewpoint of the source coding exponent). To this end, we study a much wider class of random-binning distributions, which includes the ensemble of VRSW codes as a special case, but it also goes considerably beyond. We first show that, with the exception of some pathological cases, the smaller ensemble, of VRSW codes, is as good as the larger ensemble in terms the trade-off between the error exponent and the source coding exponent. Notwithstanding this finding, the wider class of ensembles proposed is motivated in two ways. The first is that it outperforms VRSW codes in the above-mentioned pathological cases, and the second is that it allows robustness: in the event of a system failure that causes unavailability of the compressed bit-stream from one of the sources, it still allows reconstruction of the other source within some controllable distortion.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.