Paper detail

On modified second Paine-de Hoog-Anderssen boundary value problem

This article deals with a special case of the Sturm-Liouville boundary value problem (BVP), an eigenvalue problem characterized by the Sturm-Liouville differential operator with unknown spectra and the associated eigenfunctions. By examining the BVP in the Schrödinger form, we are interested in the problem where the corresponding invariant function takes the form of a reciprocal quadratic form. We call this BVP the modified second Paine-de Hoog-Anderssen (PdHA) problem. We estimate the lowest-order eigenvalue without solving the eigenvalue problem but by utilizing the localized landscape and effective potential functions instead. While for particular combinations of parameter values that the spectrum estimates exhibit a poor quality, the outcomes are generally acceptable although they overestimate the numerical computations. Qualitatively, the eigenvalue estimate is strikingly excellent, and the proposal can be adopted to other BVPs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.