Paper detail

On models to describe the volume in the context of establishing high-pressure Gibbs energy databases

High-pressure Gibbs energy approaches are promising for establishing multi-component thermodynamic databases. However, so far, they have often been considered unsuccessful, because of their tendency to lead to unphysical extrapolations of the thermodynamic properties at elevated temperatures and pressures. Beyond this symptom, the root causes of the problem are rarely investigated. In this work, it is identified that these shortcomings are caused by (i) an inconsistent treatment of the SGTE method of extrapolation, and (ii) an insufficient knowledge of the models to describe the volume that are the key to extend CALPHAD databases toward high pressures. Because the first step toward solving the problem is to focus on the later issue, several models to describe the volume that are built upon the Grover empirical law are investigated, namely, the Lu-Grover, Joubert-Lu-Grover, Jacobs-Grover, and the Anand-Saxena-Grover approaches. In addition, an original description built upon the concept of thermal pressure, and a new scheme based on the equivalence between temperature and pressure when computing the volume are discussed. For each of these models, limitations and possibilities are identified from a practical standpoint.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.