Paper detail

On minimum phase transformation and filter design

Minimum-phase finite impulse response filters are widely used in practice, and much research has been devoted to the design of such filters. However, for the important case of Chebyshev filters there is a curious mismatch between current best practice and well-established theoretical principles. The paper shows that this difference can be understood through analysis of the time-domain factorization of a suitable extended matrix. This analysis explains why the definition of a factorable linear phase filter must be revised. The time domain analysis of factorization suggests initial values leading to fast and accurate convergence of iterative algorithms for the design of minimum-phase finite impulse response filters. Numerical results are provided to demonstrate that a significant improvement in filter tap accuracy is obtained when the well-established theoretical principles are correctly applied to the design of minimum phase finite impulse response filters.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.