Paper detail

On Min-Cost Multiflow Problem in Node-Capacitated Undirected Networks

We consider an undirected graph $G = (VG, EG)$ with a set $T \subseteq VG$ of terminals, and with nonnegative integer capacities $c(v)$ and costs $a(v)$ of nodes $v\in VG$. A path in $G$ is a \emph{$T$-path} if its ends are distinct terminals. By a \emph{multiflow} we mean a function $F$ assigning to each $T$-path $P$ a nonnegative rational \emph{weight} $F(P)$, and a multiflow is called \emph{feasible} if the sum of weights of $T$-paths through each node $v$ does not exceed $c(v)$. The \emph{value} of $F$ is the sum of weights $F(P)$, and the \emph{cost} of $F$ is the sum of $F(P)$ times the cost of $P$ w.r.t. $a$, over all $T$-paths $P$. Generalizing known results on edge-capacitated multiflows, we show that the problem of finding a minimum cost multiflow among the feasible multiflows of maximum possible value admits \emph{half-integer} optimal primal and dual solutions. Moreover, we devise a strongly polynomial algorithm for finding such optimal solutions.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.