Paper detail

On microscopic derivation of a fractional stochastic Burgers equation

We derive from a class of microscopic asymmetric interacting particle systems on ${\mathbb Z}$, with long range jump rates of order $|\cdot|^{-(1+α)}$ for $0<α<2$, different continuum fractional SPDEs. More specifically, we show the equilibrium fluctuations of the hydrodynamics mass density field of zero-range processes, depending on the stucture of the asymmetry, and whether the field is translated with process characteristics velocity, is governed in various senses by types of fractional stochastic heat or Burgers equations. The main result: Suppose the jump rate is such that its symmetrization is long range but its (weak) asymmetry is nearest-neighbor. Then, when $α<3/2$, the fluctuation field in space-time scale $1/α:1$, translated with process characteristic velocity, irrespective of the strength of the asymmetry, converges to a fractional stochastic heat equation, the limit also for the symmetric process. However, when $α\geq 3/2$ and the strength of the weak asymmetry is tuned in scale $1-3/2α$, the associated limit points satisfy a martingale formulation of a fractional stochastic Burgers equation.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.