Paper detail

On Locally GCD Equivalent Number Fields

Local GCD Equivalence is a relation between extensions of number fields which is weaker than the classical arithmetic equivalence. It was originally studied by Lochter with Weak Kronecker Equivalence. Among the many results he got, Lochter discovered that number fields extensions of degree $\leq 5$ which are locally GCD equivalent are in fact isomorphic. This fact can be restated saying that number fields extensions of low degree are uniquely characterized by the splitting behaviour of a restricted set of primes: in particular, also extensions of degree 3 and 5 are uniquely determined by their inert primes, just like the quadratic fields. The goal of this note is to present this rigidity result with a different proof, which insists especially on the densities of sets of prime ideals and their use in the classification of number fields up to isomorphism. Alongside Chebotarev's Theorem, no harder tools than basic Group and Galois Theory are required.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.