Paper detail

On List-decodability of Random Rank Metric Codes

In the present paper, we consider list decoding for both random rank metric codes and random linear rank metric codes. Firstly, we show that, for arbitrary $0<R<1$ and $ε>0$ ($ε$ and $R$ are independent), if $0<\frac{n}{m}\leq ε$, then with high probability a random rank metric code in $F_{q}^{m\times n}$ of rate $R$ can be list-decoded up to a fraction $(1-R-ε)$ of rank errors with constant list size $L$ satisfying $L\leq O(1/ε)$. Moreover, if $\frac{n}{m}\geqΘ_R(ε)$, any rank metric code in $F_{q}^{m\times n}$ with rate $R$ and decoding radius $ρ=1-R-ε$ can not be list decoded in ${\rm poly}(n)$ time. Secondly, we show that if $\frac{n}{m}$ tends to a constant $b\leq 1$, then every $F_q$-linear rank metric code in $F_{q}^{m\times n}$ with rate $R$ and list decoding radius $ρ$ satisfies the Gilbert-Varsharmov bound, i.e., $R\leq (1-ρ)(1-bρ)$. Furthermore, for arbitrary $ε>0$ and any $0<ρ<1$, with high probability a random $F_q$-linear rank metric codes with rate $R=(1-ρ)(1-bρ)-ε$ can be list decoded up to a fraction $ρ$ of rank errors with constant list size $L$ satisfying $L\leq O(\exp(1/ε))$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.