Paper detail

On Lipschitz Bijections between Boolean Functions

For two functions $f,g:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}$ a mapping $ψ:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}^n$ is said to be a $\textit{mapping from $f$ to $g$}$ if it is a bijection and $f(z)=g(ψ(z))$ for every $z\in\{0,1\}^n$. In this paper we study Lipschitz mappings between boolean functions. Our first result gives a construction of a $C$-Lipschitz mapping from the ${\sf Majority}$ function to the ${\sf Dictator}$ function for some universal constant $C$. On the other hand, there is no $n/2$-Lipschitz mapping in the other direction, namely from the ${\sf Dictator}$ function to the ${\sf Majority}$ function. This answers an open problem posed by Daniel Varga in the paper of Benjamini et al. (FOCS 2014). We also show a mapping from ${\sf Dictator}$ to ${\sf XOR}$ that is 3-local, 2-Lipschitz, and its inverse is $O(\log(n))$-Lipschitz, where by $L$-local mapping we mean that each of its output bits depends on at most $L$ input bits. Next, we consider the problem of finding functions such that any mapping between them must have large \emph{average stretch}, where the average stretch of a mapping $ϕ$ is defined as ${\sf avgStretch}(ϕ) = {\mathbb E}_{x,i}[dist(ϕ(x),ϕ(x+e_i)]$. We show that any mapping $ϕ$ from ${\sf XOR}$ to ${\sf Majority}$ must satisfy ${\sf avgStretch}(ϕ) \geq Ω(\sqrt{n})$. In some sense, this gives a "function analogue" to the question of Benjamini et al. (FOCS 2014), who asked whether there exists a set $A \subset \{0,1\}^n$ of density 0.5 such that any bijection from $\{0,1\}^{n-1}$ to $A$ has large average stretch. Finally, we show that for a random balanced function $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}^n$ with high probability there is a mapping $ϕ$ from ${\sf Dictator}$ to $f$ such that both $ϕ$ and $ϕ^{-1}$ have constant average stretch. In particular, this implies that one cannot obtain lower bounds on average stretch by taking uniformly random functions.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.