Paper detail

On Liouville systems at critical parameters, Part 2: Multiple bubbles

In this paper, we continue to consider the generalized Liouville system: $$ Δ_g u_i+\sum_{j=1}^n a_{ij}ρ_j\left(\frac{h_j e^{u_j}}{\int h_j e^{u_j}}- {1} \right)=0\quad\text{in \,}M,\quad i\in I=\{1,\cdots,n\}, $$ where $(M,g)$ is a Riemann surface $M$ with volume $1$, $h_1,..,h_n$ are positive smooth functions and $ρ_j\in \mathbb R^+$($j\in I$). In previous works Lin-Zhang identified a family of hyper-surfaces $Γ_N$ and proved a priori estimates for $ρ=(ρ_1,..,ρ_n)$ in areas separated by $Γ_N$. Later Lin-Zhang also calculated the leading term of $ρ^k-ρ$ where $ρ\in Γ_1$ is the limit of $ρ^k$ on $Γ_1$ and $ρ^k$ is the parameter of a bubbling sequence. This leading term is particularly important for applications but it is very hard to be identified if $ρ^k$ tends to a higher order hypersurface $Γ_N$ ($N>1$). Over the years numerous attempts have failed but in this article we overcome all the stumbling blocks and completely solve the problem under the most general context: We not only capture the leading terms of $ρ^k-ρ\in Γ_N$, but also reveal new robustness relations of coefficient functions at different blowup points.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.